One small step for man, one enormous leap for science
This comment from Matt Alden-Farrow on the BBC sums up the situation nicely:
“This discovery could one day change our understanding of the universe and the way in which things work. Doesn’t mean previous scientists were wrong; all science is built on the foundation of others work.”
From our perspective, this comment not only sums up the debate, but also the reality of the situation. Scientific discoveries are always built on the findings of those that went before and the ability to advance knowledge often depends on the tools available.
Isaac Newton developed his theory of gravity when an Apple fell on his head – the sophisticated technology we rely on today just didn’t exist. His ‘technology’ was logic. Einstein used chemicals and mathematical formulae which had been discovered and proven. CERN used the large hadron collider and high performance computing.
The reality is that scientific knowledge is built in baby steps, and the time these take is often determined by the time it takes for the available technology to catch up with the existing level of knowledge. If we had never known Einstein’s theory of relativity, who’s to say that CERN would have even attempted to measure the speed of particle movement?
VMworld Signage - "Are You Cloud Intense?"
Show Your Cloud Intensity
I'm not sure we are philosophers, but we definitely know how to help customers build private clouds with IaaS management software!
Best of VMworld Award for Private Cloud Management
![]() |
| Best of VMworld 2011 Private Cloud |
This award follows other recent successes such as being named the #1 private cloud vendor by Forrester Research. Customers want a trusted vendor that has proven themselves in large-scale, enterprise environments, and one that has been around for a few years. Companies just don't want to trust their data centers to a startup with an uncertain future. There is just too much at-risk.
| Platform team celebrates the win at VMworld! |
Our private cloud / IaaS management solution, called Platform ISF, was cited for the following key differentiators:
- Cloud in a cloud in a cloud – ability to support multiple hierarchical organizational structures with nested virtual private clouds for business units, groups, projects, etc.
- Physical deployment – includes native capability to do bare metal physical provisioning all the way to complex multi-tier application structures
- Application-centric framework – IT services are captured as standardized applications or application components that are multi-tiered, virtual and physical, private and public cloud, etc.
- Automated provisioning of VMware – deep integration that maintains investment in VMware with automatic discovery, import (all or partial), synchronization, and simplification of provisioning VMware environments
- Multi-hypervisor with KVM and Xen – adds a management layer similar to vCenter on top of KVM / Xen to normalize capabilities across hypervisors
- Integration with P2V (physical to virtual) – support for multiple provisioning tools plus a Platform native option to support the ongoing transition of more applications and workloads to virtual environments
- Managing resource pools on DRS clusters – adding control over resource pools on DRS clusters with end user self-service management aligned to hierarchical account management
- Policy management - depth and breadth of policy management capabilities for both initial placement and operational service level agreements (SLAs) such as flexing up and down
- One solution – Platform ISF is an integrated set of IaaS management capabilities that span self-service, billing, automation, etc. versus requiring multiple solutions from different vendors that require stitching together
Top 5 VMworld 2011 Takeaways for Private Cloud
From attending the keynotes and speaking with attendees, I had 5 key takeaways from the event:
2. VMware licensing has upset many
3. Multi-hypervisor is real
4. The rise of application-centric thinking
5. Physical is part of cloud
Forrester Evaluates Private Cloud Vendors – Platform Tops Media Scoring
Complimentary Full Copy of the Report
The report is significant as the first ‘apples-to-apples” comparison of vendors using customer references, a compulsory 30 minute demonstration and written responses. Only 15 vendors were able to meet this initial hurdle, suggesting a number of vendors where marketing far outstrips reality. Vendors were scored 0-4 across 10 criteria. Forrester did not add up the scores but the media quickly did the sub-analysis and published a ranking table. The result: Platform Computing received the most points.
Source: SYS-CON Media
The # 2 vendor was VMware and we congratulate them on their effort. Given that one of the key report findings is to “prepare for islands of hypervisors” – meaning an increase in the need to support other hypervisors such as KVM and Xen -- companies should pause to reconsider locking into a single hypervisor vendor. Cloud is much more than VM. Also, be careful about pricing models that penalize your ability to utilize your cloud environment more efficiently (i.e., per VM versus per server).
Read the Platform Computing press release
Another interesting point was discussed by the report’s author, James Staten, in his blog. Mr. Staten cautions readers to evaluate vendors on their specific requirements. We totally agree.
First, in the report, an attempt is made to catalog vendors based upon their origins, e.g., enterprise systems management vendors versus pure-play cloud solutions, etc. Our belief is that regardless of origins, customers should choose a vendor with a comprehensive technology footprint, solid customer base, strong financials, and global support system. Claiming you are # 1 among pure-play or grid vendors is meaningless and an artificial distinction. At the end of the day, one wants the best solution to solving a set of problems. Period.
Second, Mr. Staten recommends looking differently at either software-only versus ‘physical compute and storage included’ vendors. If you take those points away from HP, IBM, Dell, Microsoft, and BMC, the Platform lead just grows. And if you want an appliance, Platform has partners that offer a complete pre-integrated solution today.
Finally, the report recommends a strategy of trying before you buy. Since a private cloud project involves both technology and process change, we recommend running a proof-of-concept (POC) to gain buy-in from end user communities and different business units. A POC can also help validate assumptions against your business case for justifying the value of a private cloud.
Resources
- Learn more about Platform's private cloud solution here
- Download the Platform ISF product here
- Schedule a discovery session with one of our cloud consultants by contacting us at privatecloud@platform.com.
Are there any criteria that you would have added to the evaluation?
Private Cloud at State Street
There is nothing better than a real world customer case study to explain the value of deploying a product. Cut through the marketing and explain:
- The underlying problem / pain points
- The vendor selection process
- Key decisions and lesson learned
- Actual value being achieved
At the recent Wall Street & Technology Capital Markets Cloud Symposium, the Chief Infrastructure Architect from State Street, Kevin Sullivan, discussed how cloud – specifically private cloud – is being rolled out across 20+ projects.
For more details about Mr. Sullivan's presentation, there is a great article in Advanced Trading magazine by Phil Albinus. Mr. Albinus provides details about the decision making process, key vendors, and next steps. To learn more about Platform Computing's cloud solution, please visit our private cloud solution area.
Some additional metrics that were discussed include:
- Started in 2009
- Went from 400 to 150 use cases
- Operated a 6 month proof-of-concept (POC)
- Down-selected from 150 technology partners to a ‘handful’
- Provisioning has been reduced from 8 weeks to hours
- Unique Active-Active two data center configuration for 100% app high availability
One of the four key elements to the State Street cloud environment is the ‘cloud controller’. In their environment, the cloud controller manages self-service, configurations, provisioning, and automation of the application construction within the infrastructure. A key benefit for the developers was the ability to get access to more self-service capacity on-demand much faster. This easily outweighed any cultural concerns regarding not being able to specify to the n-th degree an IT environment request. If needed, IT could still request ‘custom’ but it would take longer.
In addition, Mr. Sullivan highlighted several key design principles driving the design, building, and management of the cloud:
- Simplification – creating of standards, consolidation, and self-service
- Automation – for deployment, metrics, elasticity, and monitoring
- Leverage – commodity hardware and software stack with a focus on reuse of the platform, services, and data
The benefits and successes of private cloud at State Street are becoming increasingly known as their CIO Christopher Perretta is fond of discussing the topic. Some additional resources to learn more about the State Street cloud project are:
What do you think can be learned from State Street’s successes?







